January 1, 2014 is indeed a big day in our space, mostly for the way employers will be impacted by the individual mandate. The non-mandated provisions on wellness incentives also take effect (proposed regulations), increasing the allowable incentives and cementing the growing trend for wellness programs to require proof of healthy habits rather than just a pledge to try. Do the waters feel safer now to put some serious bait out there for employees? We think so.
More and more companies are willing to put real money at stake to motivate employees and their dependents toward healthy habits. Most employers have started off with participatory programs (take an assessment, get a discount off your premium) as the first step in a long-term wellness strategy. Now, measuring employee health is the new normal. Health-based incentives (get a biometric screening, get an incentive for healthy cholesterol and blood pressure) make participation important but so do results. The National Business Group on Health reports that 30% of large employers link health outcomes and financial incentives).
ACA allows health plans to increase the incentives for individuals who meet specific health metrics from 20% of the cost of coverage to 30%. And, for programs related to tobacco use, the incentive can be as high as 50% of the cost of coverage. There are no changes to the five non-discrimination provisions that apply to any health-based incentive program about the “frequency of opportunity to qualify, size of reward, uniform availability and reasonable alternative standards, reasonable design, and notice of other means of qualifying for the reward.”
The proposed regulations suggest that the new provisions impact grandfathered and non-grandfathered plans the same way.
Will employers clamor for higher incentives? Asked another way, how much is it worth to you to avoid another participant with lung cancer, adult onset diabetes or avoid a triple-bypass heart surgery? In hard dollars via claims costs, absenteeism and higher group rates—and in less tangible results like company culture, individual happiness?
Let’s look at the ROI question. The Department of Labor, in developing their proposed regulations, ordered a study of the current wellness practices and results. Researchers found five peer-reviewed studies citing ROI ranging from $1.65 to $6 for each dollar spent on wellness programs.
Big numbers like that often bring up the question of engagement. Will I only encourage healthy people to stay healthy? We’ve seen a balanced strategy—of wellness program incentives, simple program administration and an engaging communication strategy yield employee participation topping 90%. To get it right, you’ve got to be aware of the readiness for change at your organization. According to a recent National Business Group on Health survey, two out of three employees didn’t think participation in a wellness program should be required to get health insurance. And a still higher percentage said they don’t want to be charged more for coverage if they don’t meet specific health goals. It’s no surprise that we’d advocate for some communication when implementing a health-based incentive program, but these statistics spotlight the importance of listening and considering current employee and spouse attitudes to make your strategy a success.
The regulations invite comments about how to prorate incentives when family members are invited to participate and how to define programs targeted at tobacco use. If you have strong opinions on where these regulations should offer increased flexibility or better protect employees, the commenting period is open till January 25, 2013. Just search for “Wellness.”